Journal Search Engine

Download PDF Export Citation Korean Bibliography
ISSN : 1226-9999(Print)
ISSN : 2287-7851(Online)
Korean J. Environ. Biol. Vol.30 No.3 pp.157-163

Antioxidative Activity and Anti-inflammatory Effects on the Murine Macrophages of Methanol Extracts of Amphibians

Hong-Shik Oh2,*, Sang-Bum Kim, Min-Ho Chang1, Sang-Hyun Han2
2Department of Science Education, Jeju National University
Ohyun Middle School, 1National Park Research Institute, Korea National Park Service
(Received: 11 June 2012, Revised: 6 July 2012, Revision accepted: 9 July 2012)


Oxidative stress has been reported to be one of causes of neuritis. This study examinedantioxidative activities of methanol extracts of six amphibian species known to be medicinal animals(Rana catesbeiana, R. coreana, R. rugosa, R. dybowskii, R. nigromaculata, and Hyla japonica) andinvestigated their effects of inhibiting nitric oxide (NO) production and cytotoxicity on the murinemacrophage RAW264.7 cells. As inflammation is closely associated with reactive oxygen species,assays on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, xanthine oxidase inhibitoryactivity, superoxide anion radical scavenging activity and NO scavenging activity of theextracts of the six species were performed to investigate their antioxidative activity. The resultsobtained were as follows; All extracts showed antioxidative activity, and the activity of R. dybowskiiwas the highest in comparison among those. Anti-inflammatory effects of the extracts were alsoexamined, the five extracts except that of R. rugosa did not show cytotoxicity for RAW264.7 cells atthe maximal concentration (1,000 μg mL-1). Selectivity index, meaning NO scavenging activity comparedto cytotoxicity, showed the highest level in the extract of R. dybowskii. These results will bevery useful basic data for future studies on prevention and treatment of human diseases to understandthe biological roles of amphibian extracts throughout the antioxidative or anti-inflammatorypathways.



 For useful biological resources, the interest in their use and the researches for them have focused on plants such as natural medicine and the interest in use and development of useful animals have been very low around the world. However, diversity and usefulness of animals is currently rethought and development of technologies in the agricultural and biological industries leads to confirmation of high possibility of using amphibians as a biological resource (Erspamer et al. 1986; Rinaldi 2002; Lu et al. 2008; Gomes et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012). The use as a biological resource emphasizes the importance of gene pool and the use for productive, medical and dietary purposes. In particular, the use of amphibians for a medical purpose has been well known in both of Oriental and Western countries and in Korea it also has been utilized as a medicinal animal in traditional oriental medicine and fork remedies (Mor et al. 1994; Batista et al. 1999; Je et al. 2007; Qian et al. 2008; Cho et al. 2009; Jin et al. 2009). However, its effects and usage as a material for traditional oriental medicine shown in references and antient books were induced from experiences, fork remedies and traditional oriental medicine without a scientific analysis (Park and Lee 1998; Park et al. 2005).

Amphibians are usually called as ‘wa’ in traditional oriental medicine because it croaks well. In [Donguibogam] its cold characteristic was reported to control fissure and foods of children and in [Pen-Tsao-Kang-Mu] it was written to relieve diarrhea and pathology of fever. In traditional oriental medicine, it is used for nephropathy, diuresis, nutrition and flatulence, dried powder in warm honey water or boiled amphibian bodies by itself is eaten as a special efficient medicine of pulmonary tuberculosis, roborant and asthma. This study was conducted to provide necessary data for researches on antioxidants and anti-inflammatory materials and on their isolation and mechanism to prevent and cure diseases by investigating biological activity such as antioxidant activity and anti-inflammatory effect of methanol (MeOH) extracts of six amphibian species collected in Korea, which has been rarely studied and has been reported to be used as a fork remedy. 


1. Animals and preparation of extracts

Six amphibian species (R. catesbeiana, R. coreana, R. rugosa, R. dybowskii, R. nigromaculata, and H. japonica) were used for this study obtained from American Bullfrog Capture Operation Division (Jeongeup, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea) and Frog Village (Muju, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea). After lyophilization of animal specimens, samples were subsequently grinded, deposited on 500mL 80% MeOH, and extracted three times by using a sonicator. And then, the supernatant was isolated and evaporated and after frozen drying it was used with diluted with 100 mg mL-1 1 : 1 ethanol (EtOH) : phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution. 

2. Cell culture

Murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was obtained from Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and was incubated at 37oC with 5% CO2 conditions using Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) including 100 units mL-1 penicillin-streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Subcultures were conducted every 3~4 days. 

3. DPPH radical scavenging activity assay

To examine antioxidant activity of each sample, the Blois (1958) method measuring radical scavenging effect with DPPH (Sigma, USA) was used. DPPH solution was made by dissolving around 2 mg DPPH in 15 mL EtOH. After adding 6.25 mL dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to 12 mL of the solution, it was diluted with EtOH for absorbance of the control to be 0.94~0.97 at 517 nm wavelength and was shaken for 10 sec. In addition, 100 μL samples of each concentration dissolved in MeOH were put on 96 well plate and a same amount of 0.4 mM DPPH was added. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, absorbance was measured at 517 nm. 

4. Xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity assay

The production of uric acid caused by xanthine/xanthine oxidase was measured with the increased absorbance at 290 nm (Cheng et al. 1998) and allopurinol (Sigma, USA) was used as the control. For the mixture, each samples of various concentrations, 0.5 mM xanthine and 1 mM EDTA were prepared in 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and 50 units μL-1 xanthine oxidase was added to induce production of uric acid. Xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity was presented with the decreased rate of absorbance of the produced uric acid. 

5. Superoxide anion scavenging activity assay

The amount of superoxide anion formed by using phenazine methosulfate (PMS)/NADH system was measured at 517 nm with nitroblue tetrazolium reduction method (Fridovich 1970; Nishikimi et al. 1972; Liu et al. 1997). The mixture was prepared with each sample, 125 μM NADH and 63 μM NBT in 200 μL PBS (pH 8.4) and 8 μM PMS was added to provoke production of superoxide. Superoxide anion scavenging activity was shown with the decreased rate of absorbance of the produced superoxide. 

6. NO scavenging activity assay

NO scavenging activity was analyzed by using sodium nitroprusside (SNP) forming naturally NO (Green et al. 1982; Marcocci et al. 1994). Each samples of various concentrations were added to 10 mM SNP and was incubated at 25oC for 3 hr. After the reaction, Griess solution [1% (w/v) sulfanilamide, 0.1% N-1-naphylethylen diamine in 2.5% (v/v) phosphoric acid] of a same amount with the mixture was added. It was at room temperature for 10 min and its absorbance was measured at 540 nm. NO scavenging activity was calculated with the amount of residual nitrite. The activity was presented with % of the scavenging activity at 500μg mL-1.

7. Cytotoxicity assay

RAW264.7 cells were put into 96 well microplates with 2×105 cells well-1 by using the DMEM and were incubated for 18 hr. After each samples of different concentrations and 100 ng mL-1 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma, USA) were added and incubated for 24 hr. 2 mg mL-1 3-(4,5-dimehtyl-thiazol)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added and was incubated for 1 hr and the media was removed. After the formazan sediment produced by reduction of MTT by adding 200 μL DMSO was dissolved and absorbance was measured at 540 nm with a microplate reader (Biotek, USA). By comparing the absorbance of each sample at each concentration with that of the untreated sample, cytotoxicity of the sample to RAW264.7 cells was evaluated. 

8. NO production inhibition assay

RAW264.7 cells (2×105 cells well-1) were put into 96 well plates and each samples of various concentrations were treated. After adding LPS (100 ng mL-1), it was incubated for 24 hr. After mixing 100 μL supernatant of the media with 100 μL Griess solution they were incubated on 96 well plates for 10 min and absorbance was measured at 530 nm. The amount of NO was compared with that of sodium nitrite as a standard. 

9. Statistical analysis

The results were presented with a mean and standard deviation and a statistical significance was analyzed with Student’s t-test. 


1. Antioxidative activity of amphibian extracts

The antioxidant activities of MeOH extracts of R. catesbeiana, R. coreana, R. rugosa, R. dybowskii, R. nigromaculata, and H. japonica were presented in Table 1 and Fig. 1. DPPH free radical scavenging activity was increased with depending on the treated concentrations (Fig. 1A) and the IC50 values showing a concentration with 50% scavenging activity of each sample was the lowest in R. dybowskii by recording 1,570 μg mL-1 and the highest in R. catesbeiana (Table 1). Xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity of the amphibian MeOH extracts was measured with xanthine/xanthine oxidase system. Xanthine oxidase inhibitory effect at 625 μg mL-1 showed the highest level, 95.3% in R. dybowskii and the lowest level, 53.3% in R. rugosa (Table 1, Fig. 1). 

Fig. 1. Dose-dependent scavenging effects on DPPH radical, NO and xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity by amphibian extracts. The data indicate the mean±S.D. of triplicate experiments. A: R. catesbeiana; B: R. coreana; C: R. rugosa; D: R. dybowskii; E: H. japonica; F: R. nigromaculata.

Table 1. Comparison of antioxidative potential of MeOH extracts of amphibians

Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity of the extracts showed low levels in all of the samples by recording less than 5% (Table 1). NO is an active species with a strong cytotoxicity and the production of much NO provokes indirect effects including nitrosation and nitration and oxidation to induce harmful effects. NO scavenging activity of the MeOH extracts of the six species of Amphibia was measured with the amount of nitrite by using SNP forming NO. At 2.5 mg mL-1 each sample showed 48~15% scavenging activity and the scavenging effect of R. dybowskii, R. nigromaculata and H. japonica was found to be good by recording 48.1, 42.5 and 35.1%, respectively while that of R. coreana, R. catesbeiana and R. rugosa was relatively low by recording 26.7, 20.2 and 15.6%, respectively. Like previous studies on antioxidant activity of medicinal insect extracts revealing that the extracts of Anomala albopilosa, Sympetrum eroticum and Anax parthenope had high antioxidant activity (Kim et al. 2004; Yoon et al. 2007), this study also found that amphibians produced a superior antioxidant activity.

2. Anti-inflammatory activity of amphibian extracts

For vertebrates, infection and damage of capillary vessels of skin tissues provoke proliferation of synovial cells and increase of fibroblasts and macrophages along with saturation of lymphocytes inside of connective tissues. Interlukin secreted from the lymphocytes by these changes, actives effector lymphocytes and promotes various enzyme such as hyaluronidase, elastase and collagenase and inflammatory mediators like prostaglandin to trigger inflammation destroying connective tissues (Deby 1988; Shimizu and Wolfe 1990).

NO is a free radial produced from L-arginine with nitric oxide synthases (NOSs) (Palmer et al. 1988) and it shows many biological functions including body defence, signal transduction and a function as a secondary messenger of vasodilation (Monacada et al. 1991; Knowles and Mocada 1992; Nathan 1992). Constitutive NOS (cNOS) contains neuronal- and endothelial-NOS expressed in neurons and endothelial cells, respectively. The production of NO caused by cNOSs play a key role in managing homeostasis of a body (Kawamata et al. 2000). However, contrary to cNOSs, inducible NOS (iNOS) is presented on macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, hepatocytes and myocardial cells by following the stimuli of LPS, interferon-g, interleukin (IL)-1b and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Lee et al. 2000). The iNOS expressed on these tissues leads to inflammation, tumor (Nathan 1992), damage of tissues, gene variation and damage of nerves by producing much NO for a long time (Stuehr et al. 1991; Weisz et al. 1996). Like this, inflammation-related NO and prostaglandin E2  are formed by iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2.

Macrophage is known to be related with homeostasis by affecting many host responses such as acquired immunity as well as innate immunity and it is very critical for body defense in the early infection by making NO and cytokine during inflammatory reaction (Higuchi et al. 1990). LPS existing on the outer membrane of gram positive bacteremia is reported to be an endotoxin and trigger sepsis and shock with released from the outer membrane when bacteria die. LPS increases synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokine such as TNF-α, IL-1b and IL-6 on macrophages like RAW264.7 cells or mononuclear cells, and particularly TNF-α and IL-1b induce expression of iNOS (Higuchi et al. 1990; Willeaume et al. 1995; McDaniel et al. 1996).

 According to the results, MeOH extracts of R. catesbeiana, R. coreana, R. dybowskii, R. nigromaculata, and H. japonica did not show cytotoxicity to the maximal concentration, 1,000 μg mL-1 and TC50  of R. rugosa showing 50% cytotoxicity was observed to be 333.6μg mL-1. Selectivity index meaning NO scavenging activity compared to cytotoxicity was the highest in R. dybowskii by recording 6.96 and those of R. rugosa, R. coreana, R. catesbeiana, R. nigromaculata and H. japonica recorded 4.63, 3.46, 3.29, 2.92 and 2.51, respectively (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Table. 2. Cell toxicity and the effects on LPS-induced NO production of the MeOH extracts in RAW264.7 cells

Fig. 2. Effects of MeOH extracts on the NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Cells were treated with LPS (100 ng mL-1) alone or LPS plus the indicated concentrations of MeOH extracts for 24 hr. A: R. catesbeiana; B: R. coreana; C: R. rugosa; D: R. dybowskii; E: H. japonica; F: R. nigromaculata.

In conclusion, all MeOH extracts of the six species had antioxidant activity, and in comparison among those the activity of R. dybowskii was found to be the best by considering DPPH radical scavenging activity, xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity and NO scavenging activity. In addition, as R. dybowskii did not trigger cytotoxicity to 1,000μg mL-1 and its selectivity index was also the highest (6.96) and its efficiency was observed to be the highest among the extracts. These results of this study are considered to be important basic data for studies on antioxidants and anti-inflammatory components through extraction of active ingredients from amphibians and on isolation and mechanism of active components to prevent or to treat diseases. In the future, in vitro and in vivo biological functions of sequential fractions of amphibians are needed to be examined and additional researches on possibility of an industrial use of EtOH or spirit extracts are also considered to be necessary. 


1.Batista CVF, LR Da Silva, A Sebben, A Scaloni, L Ferrara, GR Paiva, T Olamendi-Portugal, LD Possani and C Bloch Jr. 1999. Antimicrobial peptides from Brazilian frog Phyllomedusa distincta. Peptides 20:679-686.
2.Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 181:1198-1200.
3.Cheng ZJ, SC Kuo, SC Chan, FN Ko and CM Teng. 1998. Antioxidant properties of butein isolated from Dalbergia odorifera. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1392:291-299.
4.Cho JH, BH Sung and SC Kim. 2009. Buforins: Histone H2Aderived antimicrobial peptides from toad stomach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 1788:1564-1569.
5.Deby C. 1988. Metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids, precursors of eicosanoids. pp.11-36. In Prostaglandins: Biology and chemistry of prostaglandins and related eicosanoids (Curtis-Prior PB ed.). Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
6.Erspamer V, FG Erspamer and JM Cei. 1986. Active peptides in the skins of two hundred and thirty American amphibian species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 85:125-137.
7.Fridovich I. 1970. Quantitative aspects of the production of superoxide anion radical by milk xanthine oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 245:4053-4057.
8.Gomes A, B Giri, A Alam, S Mukherjee, P Bhattacharjee and A Gomes. 2011. Anticancer activity of a low immunogenic protein toxin (BMP1) from Indian toad (Bufo melanosticua, Schneider) skin extract. Toxincon 58:85-92.
9.Green LC, DA Wagner, J Glogowski, PL Skipper, JS Wishnok and SR Tannenbaum. 1982. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 126:131-136.
10.Higuchi M, N Hisgahi, H Taki and T Osawa. 1990. Cytolytic mechanism of activated macrophage. Tumor necrosis factor and L-arginine dependent mechanism acts as synergistically as the major cytolytic mechanism of activated macrophages. J. Immunol. 144:1425-1431.
11.Je J, Z Qian and S Kim. 2007. Antioxidant peptide isolated from muscle protein of bullfrog, Rana catebeiana Shaw. J. Med. Food 10:401-407.
12.Jin LL, SS Song, Q Li, YH Chen, QY Wang and ST Hou. 2009. Identification and characterization of a novel antimicrobial polypeptide from the skin secretion of a Chinese frog (Rana chensinensis). Int. J. Antimicrob. Ag. 33:538-542.
13.Kawamata H, H Ochiai, N Mantani and K Terasawa. 2000. Enhanced expression of inducible NO synthase by Junentaiho-to in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line. Am. J. Chin. Med. 28:217-226.
14.Kim SB, SY Park, SH Kang, SY Choi, SJ Kim and WT Kim. 2004. Antioxidant activity of Dragofly's extracts. Cheju J. Life Science 7:35-51.
15.Knowles RG and S Mocada. 1992. Nitric oxide as signal in blood vessels. TIBS 17:399-402.
16.Lee BG, SH Kim, OP Zee, KR Lee, KY Lee, JW Han and HW Lee. 2000. Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in RAW264.7 macrophages by two-carboline alkaloids extracted from Melia azedarach. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 406:301-309.
17.Liu F, VEC Ooi and ST Chang. 1997. Free radical scavenging activities of mushroom polysaccharide extracts. Life Sci. 60:763-771.
18.Lu CX, KJ Nan and Y Lei. 2008. Agents from amphibians with anticancer properties. Anticancer Drugs 19:931-939.
19.McDaniel ML, GH Kwon, CA Marshall and JA Corbett. 1996. Cytokinins and nitric oxides in islet inflammation and diabetes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 211:24-32.
20.Marcocci L, JJ Maguire, MT Droylefaix and L Packer. 1994. The nitric oxide-scavenging properties of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201: 748-755.
21.Monacada S, RM Palmer and EA Higgs. 1991. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol. Rev. 43:109-142.
22.Mor A, K Hani and P Nicolas. 1994. The vertebrate peptide antibiotics dermaseptin have overlapping structural features but target specific microorganisms. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 31635-31641.
23.Nathan C. 1992. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J. 6:3051-3064.
24.Nishikimi M, NA Roa and K Yagi. 1972. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 46:849-854.
25.Palmer RM, DS Ashton and S Moncada. 1988. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature 333:664-666.
26.Park JY, JC Heo, SM An, EY Yun, SM Han, JS Hwang, SW Kang, CY Yun and SH Lee. 2005. High throughput compatible screening of anti-oxidative substances by insect extract library. Korean J. Food Preserv. 12:482-488.
27.Park KT and JS Lee. 1998. Review on insect resources for medical use in Kangwon province. Kor. J. Apiculture 13:79-92.
28.Qian Z, W Jung and S Kim. 2008. Free radical scavenging activity of a novel antioxidative peptide purified from hydrolysate of bullfrog skin, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Bioresource Technol. 99:1690-1698.
29.Rinaldi AC. 2002. Antimicrobial peptides from amphibian skin: an expanding scenario. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:799-804.
30.Shimizu T and LS Wolfe. 1990. Arachidonic acid cascade and signal transduction. J. Neurochem. 55:1.
31.Stuehr HJ, NS Kwon, M Weise and C Nathan. 1991. Purification of the cytokine-induced macrophage nitric oxide synthase: and FAD- and FMN-containing flavoprotein. Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7773-7777.
32.Wang C, H Li, S Li, L Tian and D Shang. 2012. Antitumor effects and cell selectivity of temporin-1CEa, an antimicrobial peptide from the skin secretions of the Cjinese brown frog (Rana chensinensis). Biochimie 94:434-441.
33.Weisz A, L Cicatielio and H Esumi. 1996. Regulation of the mouse inducible-type nitric oxide synthase gene promoter by interferon-gamma Bacterial lipopolysaccharide and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. Biochem. J. 316:209-215.
34.Willeaume V, V Kruys, T Mijatovic and G Huez. 1995. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha production induced by viruses and by lipopolysaccharides in macrophages: similarities and differences. J. Inflamm. 46:1-12.
35.Yoon WJ, JA Lee, JY Kim, SB Kim and SY Park. 2007. Antioxidant activity and physiological function of the Anomala albopilosa extracts. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 36:670-677.

Vol. 40 No. 4 (2022.12)

Journal Abbreviation 'Korean J. Environ. Biol.'
Frequency quarterly
Doi Prefix 10.11626/KJEB.
Year of Launching 1983
Publisher Korean Society of Environmental Biology
Indexed/Tracked/Covered By

Contact info

Any inquiries concerning Journal (all manuscripts, reviews, and notes) should be addressed to the managing editor of the Korean Society of Environmental Biology. Yongeun Kim,
Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
E-mail: /
Tel: +82-2-3290-3496 / +82-10-9516-1611